Editorial: Spurs fans should avoid creating unnecessary rivalry

I have been very reluctant to elaborate on the controversy surrounding Kawhi Leonard’s injury by Zaza Pachulia during Sunday’s game, but I feel I need to address this issue before tonight’s game.

It is completely understandable that people are debating whether Pachulia intentionally fouled Leonard using dirty attacks or if the whole thing was an accident.

It is completely understandable that Spurs coach Gregg Popovich feels that Pachulia’s action — intentional or not — crossed into “unsportsmanlike” territory.

It is completely understandable that Spurs fans are expressing a lot of anger towards Pachulia for injuring their star player — one who won the NBA Finals MVP award during the Spurs’ last Finals victory in 2014.

What I feel is unnecessary is the possibility of Spurs fans creating a rivalry with the Golden State Warriors — similar to that of the Spurs’ rivalry with the Los Angeles Lakers — as a result of Pachulia’s foul. I say this because the Warriors have two important connections to the Spurs in Coach Steve Kerr and Assistant Coach Mike Brown.

Brown worked under Coach Pop as an assistant coach for the Spurs in the 2002-03 season. This was David Robinson’s final season as a Spurs player. The Spurs won their second NBA championship in the summer of 2003.

Part of the reason the Spurs won the title that year, which allowed David Robinson to retire on top, is thanks to Steve Kerr, who played for the Spurs in the 2002-03 season. Anyone who is a fan of the Chicago Bulls or the San Antonio Spurs knows how great of a clutch player Kerr was back in his playing days.

In Game 6 of the 2003 Western Conference Finals against the Dallas Mavericks, the Spurs were trailing the Mavericks by 15 points with 3:44 remaining in the third quarter. Kerr managed to score 12 points in 13 minutes, making 100% of his four three-point attempts. The Spurs went on to win that game, and the Western Conference Finals, with a final score of 90-78.

Who knows what would’ve happened if it wasn’t for Kerr’s clutch shots in that game?

Let me be very clear: I have not and will not jump to conclusions about Pachulia’s foul on Leonard. However, Spurs fans have every right to speak out and publicly voice their opinion on this matter, as long as they’re not harassing Pachulia (or any other Warriors player).

Part of being a sports fan is being passionate about and loyal to your favorite team. Naturally, rivalries will occur when dramatic incidents like this unfold. However, I advise Spurs fans to remember that the Warriors have very significant connections to the legacy of the Spurs.

The Warriors team is, first and foremost, Steve Kerr’s team. Without Kerr’s heroics in Game 6 of the 2003 Western Conference Finals, we might not have won the championship that season. Not to mention Mike Brown was the assistant coach of the Spurs in this particular season.

Without these important connections, I would be all for a Spurs-Warriors rivalry. But mainly because I remember how much Kerr helped out the Spurs in the 2003 playoffs, I simply can’t support a Spurs-Warriors rivalry — for now at least.

Analysis: Spurs deteriorate without Kawhi Leonard, Warriors take advantage

Update: Kawhi Leonard appears unlikely to play in Game 2, according to Coach Gregg Popovich of the San Antonio Spurs.

Despite the pain many Spurs fans (including myself) are feeling over last night’s heartbreaking loss to the Warriors in the Oracle Arena, for better or worse, last night’s game exposed weaknesses on both teams.

One of the reporters on KSAT 12, during a Spurs pre-game show, suggested that the Spurs would have to play “four perfect games” in order to win this series. The Spurs seemed to do just that – at least up until the third quarter.

At the end of the first half, the Spurs outscored the Warriors 62-42. Kawhi Leonard outperformed Steph Curry with 18 points in the first half compared to 14 points for Curry.

The Warriors hit 38% of their field goals and 22% of their field goal attempts in the first half. They turned the ball over 10 times. The only positive for the Warriors was that they hit 74% of their free throw attempts.

The Spurs were still leading the Warriors by over 20 well into the third quarter. However, it was clearly Leonard’s injury from Zaza Pachulia that led to things going south for the Spurs.

Leonard finished the game scoring 26 points, shooting 54% from three-point range, and shooting 100% of his free throws.

Right after Leonard left the game, the Warriors scored 18 unanswered points, cutting their deficit to only five points.

The Warriors went on to win the game 113-111. Curry ended up scoring 40 points in this game, improving his field goal percentage to 54%, and he made 44% of his three-point attempts.

The biggest weakness the Spurs seemed to have in this game was their inability to stabilize their gameplay without Leonard. There were several times towards the end of the first half where the Warriors would play very fast-paced and hit a quick shot, yet the Spurs would follow up with a noticeably slower but confident pacing and counter to whatever points the Warriors scored in the previous play. This kept the Warriors from cutting the deficit to single digits by the end of the first half. Without Leonard in the lineup, the Spurs didn’t seem to know what to do other than attempt to match their pacing to that of the Warriors, which didn’t work out for them. The Spurs’ defense was perfect in terms of guarding key Warriors players like Curry and Kevin Durant in the first half, but it clearly deteriorated after Leonard’s injury caused him to be taken out of the game.

The biggest weakness for the Warriors is trying to overcome the Spurs’ defense. Clearly, Leonard’s removal in the third quarter deteriorated the Spurs’ defense. This allowed the Warriors to play at a much faster and more confident pace for the rest of the game, which helped lead to their victory over the Spurs. However, when the Spurs are on their “A” game defensively, like they were up until Leonard’s injury, the Warriors simply need to find a way to outscore the Spurs early on and force the Spurs to play especially harder.

Whether or not the Spurs have a chance to win this series will all rely on if Leonard will return to play for the rest of the series. If Leonard can return and if the Spurs can play very similarly to how they played in the first half of this game, they may very well win this series in six or seven games. Leonard is undoubtedly the center of the Spurs’ lineup. Some Spurs fans seem to not realize that the Spurs’ Leonard-less victory in Game 6 of the Western Conference Semifinals against the Houston Rockets was largely a result of poor defense on the part of the Rockets. A team simply doesn’t win a game by nearly 40 points if the other team had a good game, defensively-speaking.

If it turns out that Leonard can’t play for the rest of the series, the Spurs simply need to find a way to stabilize their gameplay when the Warriors want to play efficiently fast-paced. If the Spurs cannot do this without Leonard, we may very well be looking at another 4-0 sweep on the part of the Warriors.